|
Instructor John Wawrzynek
|
23 respondents |
| The assignments were well designed to help me understand the course material and gain a deeper perspective on the subject. |
7.0 / 7 |
| The instructor created an environment in which I could feel included |
7.0 / 7 |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
6.5 / 7 |
| Is enthusiastic about the subject matter |
7.0 / 7 |
| Identifies what the instructor considers important |
7.0 / 7 |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
6.5 / 7 |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
6.5 / 7 |
| Encourages questions from students |
7.0 / 7 |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
7.0 / 7 |
| Relates to students as individuals |
7.0 / 7 |
| Is accessible to students outside of class |
6.5 / 7 |
| Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours |
7.0 / 7 |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
6.5 / 7 |
| Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding |
6.5 / 7 |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
6.5 / 7 |
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
7.0 / 7 |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
6.0 / 7 |
| The required text/notes are beneficial |
6.7 / 7 |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
6.7 / 7 |
|
Instructor John Wawrzynek
|
31 respondents |
| The assignments were well designed to help me understand the course material and gain a deeper perspective on the subject. |
6.5 / 7 |
| The instructor created an environment in which I could feel included |
5.3 / 7 |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
5.7 / 7 |
| Is enthusiastic about the subject matter |
5.7 / 7 |
| Identifies what the instructor considers important |
5.7 / 7 |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
5.5 / 7 |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
5.7 / 7 |
| Encourages questions from students |
5.5 / 7 |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
5.7 / 7 |
| Relates to students as individuals |
5.5 / 7 |
| Is accessible to students outside of class |
5.5 / 7 |
| Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours |
5.5 / 7 |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
5.5 / 7 |
| Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding |
5.3 / 7 |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
5.7 / 7 |
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
6.0 / 7 |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
5.3 / 7 |
| The required text/notes are beneficial |
4.7 / 7 |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
5.8 / 7 |
|
Instructor John Wawrzynek
|
45 respondents |
| The assignments were well designed to help me understand the course material and gain a deeper perspective on the subject. |
6.3 / 7 |
| The instructor created an environment in which I could feel included |
6.0 / 7 |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
6.0 / 7 |
| Is enthusiastic about the subject matter |
6.5 / 7 |
| Identifies what the instructor considers important |
6.0 / 7 |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
5.5 / 7 |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
6.0 / 7 |
| Encourages questions from students |
6.0 / 7 |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
5.5 / 7 |
| Relates to students as individuals |
5.5 / 7 |
| Is accessible to students outside of class |
5.5 / 7 |
| Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours |
5.5 / 7 |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
6.0 / 7 |
| Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding |
6.0 / 7 |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
5.7 / 7 |
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
5.7 / 7 |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
5.0 / 7 |
| The required text/notes are beneficial |
6.5 / 7 |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
6.5 / 7 |
|
Instructor John Wawrzynek
|
37 respondents |
| The assignments were well designed to help me understand the course material and gain a deeper perspective on the subject. |
5.8 / 7 |
| The instructor created an environment in which I could feel included |
6.2 / 7 |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
6.6 / 7 |
| Is enthusiastic about the subject matter |
6.6 / 7 |
| Identifies what the instructor considers important |
6.6 / 7 |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
6.6 / 7 |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
6.6 / 7 |
| Encourages questions from students |
6.7 / 7 |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
6.5 / 7 |
| Relates to students as individuals |
6.5 / 7 |
| Is accessible to students outside of class |
6.7 / 7 |
| Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours |
6.7 / 7 |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
6.2 / 7 |
| Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding |
6.0 / 7 |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
6.2 / 7 |
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
6.2 / 7 |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
5.6 / 7 |
| The required text/notes are beneficial |
5.6 / 7 |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
6.7 / 7 |
|
TA Yukio Miyasaka
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Yukio Miyasaka
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Dhruv Vaish
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Rahul Kumar
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
