Electrical Engineering 296 - Spring 1989

Instructor G. Bacon 1 respondents
Discusses points of view other than his/her own 5.0 / 5
Discusses recent developments in the field 5.0 / 5
Gives references for more interesting & invovled points 5.0 / 5
Emphasizes conceptual understanding 5.0 / 5
Lectures clearly 5.0 / 5
Is well prepared 5.0 / 5
Gives lectures that are well organized 5.0 / 5
Summarizes major points 5.0 / 5
States objectives for each class session 5.0 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 5.0 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 5.0 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 5.0 / 5
Demonstrates familiarity with subject matter 5.0 / 5
Encourages questions from students 5.0 / 5
Knows if the class is understanding him/her or not 5.0 / 5
Has students apply concepts to demonstrate understanding 5.0 / 5
Has genuine interest in students 5.0 / 5
Gives personal help to students having problems in course N/A
Relates to students as individuals 5.0 / 5
Is accessible to students out of class 5.0 / 5
Is valued for advice not directly related to the course 5.0 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 5.0 / 5
Is enthusiastic about his/her subject 5.0 / 5
Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice 5.0 / 5
Has concern for the quality of his/her teaching 5.0 / 5
Motivates students to do their best work 5.0 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 5.0 / 5
Stimulates your interest in the subject 5.0 / 5
Gives exams permitting students to show understanding 5.0 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 5.0 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 5.0 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 1.0 / 5
Course is concerned with theory more than its application 1.0 / 5
The required text is beneficial N/A
Work load is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.0 / 5
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 7.0 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 7.0 / 7