Electrical Engineering 20 - Spring 2014

Instructor David Tse 34 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.2 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.4 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.8 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.4 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.8 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.1 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.9 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.1 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.8 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 3.9 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.9 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 3.9 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.7 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.6 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.0 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.9 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.2 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 3.6 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.3 / 5
Instructor Thomas Courtade 126 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.5 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.2 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.3 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.4 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.3 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.6 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.2 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.1 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.3 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 3.6 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.0 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 3.9 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.7 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.5 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.0 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.9 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.0 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 3.3 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.2 / 5
TA Evan Yao
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Timothy Tsai 24 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.9 / 5
Is well prepared 4.9 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.9 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 5.0 / 5
Answers questions accurately 5.0 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.9 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.8 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 5.0 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.9 / 5
TA Ajay Tripathi 29 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.8 / 5
Is well prepared 4.7 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.8 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 5.0 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.8 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.8 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.3 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.8 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.8 / 5
TA Dorsa Sadigh
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Hurshal Patel
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Kikat Lam
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Samuel Kim
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Suraj Gowda
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Steven Chiu
This instructor's ratings are hidden.