Electrical Engineering 16B - Spring 2017

Instructor Michel Maharbiz 233 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.9 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.6 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.4 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.6 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.5 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.4 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.3 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.5 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.4 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 4.4 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.2 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.3 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.1 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.1 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.9 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.1 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.2 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 4.0 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.5 / 5
Instructor Murat Arcak 233 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.9 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.6 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.4 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.5 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.4 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.0 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.4 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.4 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.4 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 4.1 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.3 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.4 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.0 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.1 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.9 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.1 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.2 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 4.0 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.5 / 5
TA Anastasia Shuler
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Vivek Athalye
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Kevin Chen
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Yishuang Liang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Brian Gregory Kilberg
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Jiexi Yang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Ashley Lin
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Peter Schafhalter
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA NIKHIL UDAY SHINDE
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Tianrui Guo
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Edward Wang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Xiarui Zhang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Andrew Blatner
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Saavan Patel 222 respondents
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.5 / 5
Helpful in understanding course material 4.6 / 5
Is well prepared 4.6 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.6 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.8 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.7 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.6 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.3 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.7 / 5
TA Deborah Soung
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Beliz Gunel
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA SIDDHARTH SRINIVASAN IYER
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Rachel Zhang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.