Electrical Engineering 16B - Fall 2016

Instructor Michel Maharbiz 60 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.0 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.6 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.5 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.8 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.6 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.5 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.3 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.5 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.3 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 4.4 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.2 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.2 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.0 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.1 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.9 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.2 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.2 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 4.1 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.6 / 5
Instructor Murat Arcak 60 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.8 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.6 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.5 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.5 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.4 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.1 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.3 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.4 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.4 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 4.1 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.3 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.4 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.9 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.2 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.8 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.2 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.2 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 4.1 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.6 / 5
TA Anastasia Shuler
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Sid Iyer
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Edward Wang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Charles Zhang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Saavan Patel 46 respondents
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.6 / 5
Helpful in understanding course material 4.7 / 5
Is well prepared 4.7 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.6 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.8 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.5 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.5 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.0 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.4 / 5
TA Reia Cho
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Deborah Soung
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Juan Duarte
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Varun Mishra
This instructor's ratings are hidden.