|
Instructor Vasuki Swamy
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
Instructor Daniel Aranki
|
38 respondents |
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
6.3 / 7 |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
5.6 / 7 |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
4.5 / 5 |
| Is enthusiastic about the subject matter |
4.5 / 5 |
| Identifies what he/she considers important |
4.5 / 5 |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
4.4 / 5 |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
4.4 / 5 |
| Encourages questions from students |
4.6 / 5 |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
4.6 / 5 |
| Relates to students as individuals |
4.5 / 5 |
| Is accessible to students outside of class |
4.7 / 5 |
| Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours |
4.5 / 5 |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
4.4 / 5 |
| Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding |
4.2 / 5 |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
4.1 / 5 |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
4.2 / 5 |
| Pace of the course is too fast |
3.7 / 5 |
| The required text/notes are beneficial |
3.7 / 5 |
| Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit |
3.7 / 5 |
|
Instructor Filip Maksimovic
|
38 respondents |
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
6.2 / 7 |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
5.6 / 7 |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
4.3 / 5 |
| Is enthusiastic about the subject matter |
4.5 / 5 |
| Identifies what he/she considers important |
4.2 / 5 |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
4.2 / 5 |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
4.2 / 5 |
| Encourages questions from students |
4.4 / 5 |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
4.5 / 5 |
| Relates to students as individuals |
4.4 / 5 |
| Is accessible to students outside of class |
4.5 / 5 |
| Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours |
4.6 / 5 |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
4.2 / 5 |
| Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding |
4.2 / 5 |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
4.2 / 5 |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
4.2 / 5 |
| Pace of the course is too fast |
3.7 / 5 |
| The required text/notes are beneficial |
3.7 / 5 |
| Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit |
3.7 / 5 |
|
TA Dominic Labanowski
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Thomas Rembert
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA William Scheideler
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Seiya Ono
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Nikhil Shinde
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Janny Zhang
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Mudit Gupta
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Olivia Hsu
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Grace Zhang
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Titan Yuan
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Alan Dong
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Matthew Yeh
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Kimberly Ko
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
