Electrical Engineering 145L - Fall 1989 - Stephen E. Derenzo

Instructor Stephen E. Derenzo 1 respondents
Discusses points of view other than his/her own N/A
Discusses recent developments in the field 3.0 / 5
Gives references for more interesting & invovled points 5.0 / 5
Emphasizes conceptual understanding 2.0 / 5
Lectures clearly 4.0 / 5
Is well prepared 5.0 / 5
Gives lectures that are well organized 5.0 / 5
Summarizes major points 5.0 / 5
States objectives for each class session 5.0 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 5.0 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 5.0 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 2.0 / 5
Demonstrates familiarity with subject matter 3.0 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.0 / 5
Knows if the class is understanding him/her or not 2.0 / 5
Has students apply concepts to demonstrate understanding N/A
Has genuine interest in students 3.0 / 5
Gives personal help to students having problems in course 3.0 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 3.0 / 5
Is accessible to students out of class 1.0 / 5
Is valued for advice not directly related to the course 1.0 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 5.0 / 5
Is enthusiastic about his/her subject 4.0 / 5
Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice 3.0 / 5
Has concern for the quality of his/her teaching 3.0 / 5
Motivates students to do their best work 2.0 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 2.0 / 5
Stimulates your interest in the subject 3.0 / 5
Gives exams permitting students to show understanding N/A
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 1.0 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.0 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 2.0 / 5
Course is concerned with theory more than its application 1.0 / 5
The required text is beneficial 4.0 / 5
Work load is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.0 / 5
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.0 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.0 / 7