|
Instructor D. Senderowicz
|
29 respondents |
| Discusses points of view other than his/her own |
2.8 / 5 |
| Discusses recent developments in the field |
2.9 / 5 |
| Gives references for more interesting & invovled points |
2.4 / 5 |
| Emphasizes conceptual understanding |
2.2 / 5 |
| Lectures clearly |
2.0 / 5 |
| Is well prepared |
2.3 / 5 |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
2.2 / 5 |
| Summarizes major points |
1.9 / 5 |
| States objectives for each class session |
1.8 / 5 |
| Identifies what he/she considers important |
2.4 / 5 |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
3.0 / 5 |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
2.4 / 5 |
| Demonstrates familiarity with subject matter |
2.9 / 5 |
| Encourages questions from students |
2.9 / 5 |
| Knows if the class is understanding him/her or not |
1.7 / 5 |
| Has students apply concepts to demonstrate understanding |
2.5 / 5 |
| Has genuine interest in students |
2.5 / 5 |
| Gives personal help to students having problems in course |
2.8 / 5 |
| Relates to students as individuals |
2.5 / 5 |
| Is accessible to students out of class |
3.0 / 5 |
| Is valued for advice not directly related to the course |
2.0 / 5 |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
1.9 / 5 |
| Is enthusiastic about his/her subject |
2.6 / 5 |
| Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice |
2.1 / 5 |
| Has concern for the quality of his/her teaching |
2.1 / 5 |
| Motivates students to do their best work |
2.0 / 5 |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
2.2 / 5 |
| Stimulates your interest in the subject |
2.0 / 5 |
| Gives exams permitting students to show understanding |
1.4 / 5 |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
2.0 / 5 |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
2.7 / 5 |
| Pace of the course is too fast |
3.3 / 5 |
| Course is concerned with theory more than its application |
2.7 / 5 |
| The required text is beneficial |
3.1 / 5 |
| Work load is heavier than for courses of comparable credit |
3.4 / 5 |
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
2.5 / 7 |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
3.1 / 7 |
