Electrical Engineering 106B - Spring 2016

Instructor S. Shankar Sastry 19 respondents
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.6 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.9 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.9 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.5 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.4 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.2 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.3 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 3.7 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.1 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.5 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.9 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 5.0 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.3 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.4 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.4 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 3.4 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.9 / 5
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 4.3 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 4.9 / 7
Instructor Ken Goldberg 18 respondents
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.4 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.8 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.5 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.3 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.3 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.4 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.6 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 3.9 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 5.0 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 5.0 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.9 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.3 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.3 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.8 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.2 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 3.4 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.0 / 5
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.4 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 4.7 / 7
Instructor Ruzena Bajcsy 19 respondents
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.5 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.6 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.8 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 2.9 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.0 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.2 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.8 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 3.7 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.6 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.3 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.9 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.8 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.3 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.4 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.1 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 3.2 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.9 / 5
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 4.2 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 4.7 / 7
TA Jeffrey Mahler
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Katherine Driggs-Campbell
This instructor's ratings are hidden.