Computer Science C200A - Spring 2019

Instructor Sandrine DUDOIT 26 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.5 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.8 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.1 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.2 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.9 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.5 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.8 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.5 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.5 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 4.2 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.2 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.4 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.4 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.7 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.0 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.4 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 2.9 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 4.2 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.4 / 5
Instructor John DeNero 26 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.3 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.8 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.8 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.9 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.7 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.8 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.8 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.7 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.7 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 4.5 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.5 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.6 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.6 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.0 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.2 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.4 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 2.9 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 4.2 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.4 / 5
TA Daniel Crankshaw
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Aman Dhar
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Shrishti Jeswani
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Sasank Chaganty
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Sumukh Shivakumar
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Jinkyu Kim
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Tony Hsu
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Neil Shah
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Janaki Vivrekar 50 respondents
Response Rate 46.0 / 100
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.3 / 5
Helpful in understanding course material 4.0 / 5
Is well prepared 4.7 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.3 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.3 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.7 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.3 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.7 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.3 / 5
TA Allen Shen
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Daniel Zhu
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Suraj Rampure
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Ananth Agarwal
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Manana Hakobyan
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Simon Mo
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Ashley Chien
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Samir Naqvi
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Junseo Park
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Philippe Boileau
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Hatim Ezbakhe
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Maxwell Murphy
This instructor's ratings are hidden.