|
Instructor Nicholas Weaver
|
5 respondents |
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
6.0 / 7 |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
5.8 / 7 |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
N/A |
| Is enthusiastic about the subject matter |
N/A |
| Identifies what he/she considers important |
N/A |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
N/A |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
N/A |
| Encourages questions from students |
N/A |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
N/A |
| Relates to students as individuals |
N/A |
| Is accessible to students outside of class |
N/A |
| Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours |
N/A |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
N/A |
| Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding |
N/A |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
N/A |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
4.5 / 5 |
| Pace of the course is too fast |
2.5 / 5 |
| The required text/notes are beneficial |
4.0 / 5 |
| Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit |
4.0 / 5 |
|
Instructor Gerald Friedland
|
5 respondents |
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
6.5 / 7 |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
5.8 / 7 |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
5.0 / 5 |
| Is enthusiastic about the subject matter |
5.0 / 5 |
| Identifies what he/she considers important |
5.0 / 5 |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
5.0 / 5 |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
5.0 / 5 |
| Encourages questions from students |
5.0 / 5 |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
5.0 / 5 |
| Relates to students as individuals |
5.0 / 5 |
| Is accessible to students outside of class |
5.0 / 5 |
| Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours |
5.0 / 5 |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
5.0 / 5 |
| Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding |
5.0 / 5 |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
5.0 / 5 |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
4.5 / 5 |
| Pace of the course is too fast |
2.5 / 5 |
| The required text/notes are beneficial |
4.0 / 5 |
| Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit |
4.0 / 5 |
