Computer Science 70 - Spring 2019

Instructor Babak Ayazifar 358 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.7 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.3 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.2 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.5 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.3 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.3 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.4 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.5 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.4 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 4.3 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.3 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.4 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.8 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.7 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.8 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.7 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 4.0 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 4.2 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.2 / 5
Instructor Satish Rao 358 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 4.9 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.3 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.6 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.0 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.9 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.4 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.4 / 5
Encourages questions from students 3.8 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.8 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 3.8 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.0 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.0 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.7 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.5 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.7 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.7 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 4.0 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 4.2 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.2 / 5
TA Yining Liu
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA JERRY HUANG
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Andrew Chan
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Asli Akalin
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA James Hulett
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Lavanya Mittal
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Jonathan Lin
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Jonathan Xia
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Khalil Sarwari
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Emaan Hariri
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Ming Li
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Edward Im
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Ryan Deng
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Zhaoyuan Li
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Yiming Ding
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Raymond Feng
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Jeffrey Liu
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Kireet Panuganti
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Pravin Ravishanker
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Christina Zhang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Hermish Mehta 724 respondents
Response Rate 46.0 / 100
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.7 / 5
Helpful in understanding course material 4.8 / 5
Is well prepared 4.9 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.9 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.9 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.8 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.9 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.6 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.8 / 5
TA James Gao
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Yunzhi Zhang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Kevin Zhang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Aniruddha Nrusimha
This instructor's ratings are hidden.