Computer Science 70 - Fall 2016

Instructor Jean Walrand 229 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.4 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.4 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.9 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.2 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.1 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.7 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.9 / 5
Encourages questions from students 3.8 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.1 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 3.8 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.0 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.0 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.0 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.9 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.0 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.9 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.8 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 4.3 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.2 / 5
Instructor Sanjit Seshia 229 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.3 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.4 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.1 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 3.9 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.0 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.4 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.8 / 5
Encourages questions from students 3.9 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.0 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 3.7 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.8 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 3.9 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.9 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.9 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.0 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.9 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.8 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 4.3 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.2 / 5
TA Sara Popham
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Jin Park
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Kevin Ji
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Davis Yang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Kabir Sial
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Courtney Vu
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Forest Yang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Wan Fung Chui
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Michael Zhang 160 respondents
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.8 / 5
Helpful in understanding course material 4.9 / 5
Is well prepared 4.6 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.6 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.9 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.9 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.9 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.5 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.8 / 5
TA David Wang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Benjamin Kha
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Sinho Chewi
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Nicholas Ward
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Alvin Wan
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Kevin Lowe
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Xinyu Feng
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Joo Hun Nam
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Viraj Mahesh
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Yujie Huang 160 respondents
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.6 / 5
Helpful in understanding course material 4.6 / 5
Is well prepared 4.4 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.4 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.9 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.7 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.4 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 3.9 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 5.0 / 5
TA Vivek Raghuram
This instructor's ratings are hidden.