|
Instructor Nicholas Weaver
|
336 respondents |
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
5.5 / 7 |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
5.1 / 7 |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
3.8 / 5 |
| Is enthusiastic about the subject matter |
4.7 / 5 |
| Identifies what he/she considers important |
4.3 / 5 |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
4.3 / 5 |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
3.8 / 5 |
| Encourages questions from students |
4.3 / 5 |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
4.2 / 5 |
| Relates to students as individuals |
4.2 / 5 |
| Is accessible to students outside of class |
4.3 / 5 |
| Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours |
4.2 / 5 |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
3.8 / 5 |
| Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding |
3.5 / 5 |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
3.9 / 5 |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
3.6 / 5 |
| Pace of the course is too fast |
3.8 / 5 |
| The required text/notes are beneficial |
3.2 / 5 |
| Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit |
4.0 / 5 |
|
Instructor John Wawrzynek
|
336 respondents |
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
5.2 / 7 |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
5.1 / 7 |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
4.1 / 5 |
| Is enthusiastic about the subject matter |
3.8 / 5 |
| Identifies what he/she considers important |
4.0 / 5 |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
3.4 / 5 |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
3.8 / 5 |
| Encourages questions from students |
4.1 / 5 |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
4.2 / 5 |
| Relates to students as individuals |
3.8 / 5 |
| Is accessible to students outside of class |
4.0 / 5 |
| Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours |
4.1 / 5 |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
3.8 / 5 |
| Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding |
3.6 / 5 |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
3.9 / 5 |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
3.6 / 5 |
| Pace of the course is too fast |
3.8 / 5 |
| The required text/notes are beneficial |
3.2 / 5 |
| Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit |
4.0 / 5 |
|
TA Ben Zhang
|
501 respondents |
| Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness |
4.0 / 5 |
| Helpful in understanding course material |
4.2 / 5 |
| Is well prepared |
4.2 / 5 |
| Communicates ideas effectively |
4.0 / 5 |
| Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter |
4.4 / 5 |
| Answers questions accurately |
4.2 / 5 |
| Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion |
4.0 / 5 |
| Is aware when students are having difficulty |
3.7 / 5 |
| Is accessible during office hours |
4.2 / 5 |
|
TA Tejas Kannan
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Dylan Dreyer
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Anna Li
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Peijie Li
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Irene Dea
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Nathan Pemberton
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Nicholas Riasanovsky
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Kevin Ma
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Morgan Reschenberg
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Bo Dai
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Ryan Hayes
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Nikhil Athreya
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Derek Feng
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA QIJING HUANG
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
