Computer Science 61C - Fall 2016

Instructor Randy H. Katz 191 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.0 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 4.8 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.0 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.2 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.1 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.6 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.7 / 5
Encourages questions from students 3.8 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.9 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 3.5 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.7 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 3.7 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.6 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.4 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.6 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.3 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 4.0 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 3.2 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.2 / 5
Instructor Bernhard Boser 191 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 4.7 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 4.8 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.6 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.4 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.9 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.5 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.6 / 5
Encourages questions from students 3.9 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.8 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 3.6 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.8 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 3.9 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.5 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.3 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.6 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.3 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 4.0 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 3.2 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.2 / 5
TA Rebecca Herman
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Nolan Lum
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Justin Yum
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Nate Wang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Alex Zhang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Alex Jing
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Steven Ho
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Mike Aboody
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Peijie Li
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Dylan Dreyer
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Tejas Kannan
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Angel Lim
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Run Yu (Jason) Zhang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Chonghao Huang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Andrew Lin
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Manu Goyal 149 respondents
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.4 / 5
Helpful in understanding course material 4.6 / 5
Is well prepared 4.4 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.2 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.6 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.6 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.6 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.6 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.3 / 5
TA Reese Levine
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Apurv Gandhi
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Alex Khodaverdian
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Hansong Zhang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Rahul Joshi
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Hongjian (Luke) Zhang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA David Cheng
This instructor's ratings are hidden.