Computer Science 61C - Spring 2015

Instructor Vladimir Stojanovic 84 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 4.4 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.0 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.6 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 3.5 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.5 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.3 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.5 / 5
Encourages questions from students 3.3 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.6 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 3.4 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.2 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 3.4 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.6 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.6 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.6 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.7 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.4 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 2.9 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.8 / 5
Instructor Krste Asanovic 197 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.1 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.3 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.3 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 3.9 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.8 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.2 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.8 / 5
Encourages questions from students 3.8 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.1 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 3.4 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.3 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 3.8 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.7 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.8 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.6 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.8 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.5 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 3.4 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.0 / 5
TA Martin Maas
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Nolan Lum
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Donggyu Kim
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Sagar Karandikar 32 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.8 / 5
Is well prepared 4.9 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.7 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.9 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.8 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.5 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.4 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.7 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.7 / 5
TA William Huang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Fred Hong
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Chuqiao Dong
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Shreyas Chand 33 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.8 / 5
Is well prepared 4.8 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.8 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.9 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.8 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.8 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.6 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.8 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.8 / 5
TA David Adams
This instructor's ratings are hidden.