Instructor Krste Asanovic
|
197 respondents |
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
5.1 / 7 |
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
5.3 / 7 |
Gives lectures that are well organized |
4.3 / 5 |
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter |
3.9 / 5 |
Identifies what he/she considers important |
3.8 / 5 |
Has an interesting style of presentation |
3.2 / 5 |
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
3.8 / 5 |
Encourages questions from students |
3.8 / 5 |
Is careful and precise in answering questions |
4.1 / 5 |
Relates to students as individuals |
3.4 / 5 |
Is accessible to students outside of class |
3.3 / 5 |
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours |
3.8 / 5 |
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
3.7 / 5 |
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding |
3.8 / 5 |
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
3.6 / 5 |
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
3.8 / 5 |
Pace of the course is too fast |
3.5 / 5 |
The required text/notes are beneficial |
3.4 / 5 |
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit |
4.0 / 5 |
Instructor Vladimir Stojanovic
|
84 respondents |
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
4.4 / 7 |
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
5.0 / 7 |
Gives lectures that are well organized |
3.6 / 5 |
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter |
3.5 / 5 |
Identifies what he/she considers important |
3.5 / 5 |
Has an interesting style of presentation |
3.3 / 5 |
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
3.5 / 5 |
Encourages questions from students |
3.3 / 5 |
Is careful and precise in answering questions |
3.6 / 5 |
Relates to students as individuals |
3.4 / 5 |
Is accessible to students outside of class |
3.2 / 5 |
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours |
3.4 / 5 |
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
3.6 / 5 |
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding |
3.6 / 5 |
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
3.6 / 5 |
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
3.7 / 5 |
Pace of the course is too fast |
3.4 / 5 |
The required text/notes are beneficial |
2.9 / 5 |
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit |
3.8 / 5 |
TA David Adams
|
This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
TA Shreyas Chand
|
33 respondents |
Helpful in understanding course material |
4.8 / 5 |
Is well prepared |
4.8 / 5 |
Communicates ideas effectively |
4.8 / 5 |
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter |
4.9 / 5 |
Answers questions accurately |
4.8 / 5 |
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion |
4.8 / 5 |
Is aware when students are having difficulty |
4.6 / 5 |
Is accessible during office hours |
4.8 / 5 |
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness |
4.8 / 5 |
TA Chuqiao Dong
|
This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
TA Fred Hong
|
This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
TA William Huang
|
This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
TA Sagar Karandikar
|
32 respondents |
Helpful in understanding course material |
4.8 / 5 |
Is well prepared |
4.9 / 5 |
Communicates ideas effectively |
4.7 / 5 |
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter |
4.9 / 5 |
Answers questions accurately |
4.8 / 5 |
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion |
4.5 / 5 |
Is aware when students are having difficulty |
4.4 / 5 |
Is accessible during office hours |
4.7 / 5 |
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness |
4.7 / 5 |
TA Donggyu Kim
|
This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
TA Nolan Lum
|
This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
TA Martin Maas
|
This instructor's ratings are hidden. |