|
Instructor Daniel Nguyen
|
182 respondents |
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
5.8 / 7 |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
6.2 / 7 |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
4.2 / 5 |
| Is enthusiastic about the subject matter |
4.4 / 5 |
| Identifies what he/she considers important |
4.3 / 5 |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
4.1 / 5 |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
4.2 / 5 |
| Encourages questions from students |
4.2 / 5 |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
4.2 / 5 |
| Relates to students as individuals |
4.1 / 5 |
| Is accessible to students outside of class |
4.1 / 5 |
| Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours |
4.3 / 5 |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
4.1 / 5 |
| Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding |
4.0 / 5 |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
4.3 / 5 |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
4.0 / 5 |
| Pace of the course is too fast |
3.5 / 5 |
| The required text/notes are beneficial |
3.7 / 5 |
| Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit |
4.1 / 5 |
|
Instructor Daniel Sochor
|
182 respondents |
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
6.1 / 7 |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
6.2 / 7 |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
4.5 / 5 |
| Is enthusiastic about the subject matter |
4.5 / 5 |
| Identifies what he/she considers important |
4.4 / 5 |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
4.4 / 5 |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
4.4 / 5 |
| Encourages questions from students |
4.3 / 5 |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
4.3 / 5 |
| Relates to students as individuals |
4.2 / 5 |
| Is accessible to students outside of class |
4.2 / 5 |
| Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours |
4.4 / 5 |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
4.3 / 5 |
| Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding |
4.1 / 5 |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
4.4 / 5 |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
4.0 / 5 |
| Pace of the course is too fast |
3.5 / 5 |
| The required text/notes are beneficial |
3.7 / 5 |
| Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit |
4.1 / 5 |
|
TA Ching Fang
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Steven Lin
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Xueting Ding
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Junhong Zhou
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Christine Zhou
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Antares Chen
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Matthew Sit
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Kevin Chang
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Joshua Zeitsoff
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Alexander Kazorian
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Joshua Caleb Dy
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
