Computer Science 61B - Spring 2016

Instructor Josh Hug 792 respondents
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.8 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 5.0 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.8 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.8 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.9 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.8 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.7 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 4.8 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.6 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.8 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.7 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.4 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.5 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.7 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.2 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 3.9 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.1 / 5
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.6 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.6 / 7
TA Kay Ousterhout 36 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 5.0 / 5
Is well prepared 5.0 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.9 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 5.0 / 5
Answers questions accurately 5.0 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.9 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.9 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 5.0 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 5.0 / 5
TA Rudy Laprade
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Sean Zhu
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Linggu Zhu
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Guilio Zhou
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Dennis Zhao 31 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.7 / 5
Is well prepared 4.6 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.7 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.7 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.7 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.8 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.5 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.6 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.7 / 5
TA Alan Yao 37 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.3 / 5
Is well prepared 4.5 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.3 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.6 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.7 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 3.8 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 3.6 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.4 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.3 / 5
TA Ross Teixeira 34 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.7 / 5
Is well prepared 4.8 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.6 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.8 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.7 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.6 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.3 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.5 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.6 / 5
TA Daniel Sochor 19 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.5 / 5
Is well prepared 4.7 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.4 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.7 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.6 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.4 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.4 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.3 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.6 / 5
TA Alice Sheng
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Luise Rygaard 13 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.8 / 5
Is well prepared 4.8 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.9 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.9 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.8 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.8 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.8 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.7 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.8 / 5
TA Nick Rose
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Xinhe Ren 19 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.6 / 5
Is well prepared 4.6 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.5 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.7 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.7 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.4 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.2 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.7 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.6 / 5
TA Anusha Ramakuri
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Sherdil Niyaz
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Daniel Nguyen 23 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.4 / 5
Is well prepared 4.5 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.5 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.5 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.5 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.3 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.1 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 3.9 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.4 / 5
TA Yeseon Lee
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Jimmy Lee 16 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.4 / 5
Is well prepared 4.4 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.3 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.4 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.4 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.1 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.0 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.2 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.3 / 5
TA Austin Le 29 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.9 / 5
Is well prepared 4.9 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.9 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.9 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.8 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.8 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.6 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.8 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.9 / 5
TA Sarah Kim 37 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.7 / 5
Is well prepared 4.8 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.8 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.9 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.8 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.6 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.5 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.7 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.7 / 5
TA Chris Jeng 41 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.6 / 5
Is well prepared 4.5 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.6 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.7 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.6 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.8 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.5 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.7 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.6 / 5
TA Allen Guo 42 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.4 / 5
Is well prepared 4.5 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.5 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.8 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.7 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.6 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.3 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.3 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.5 / 5
TA Gilbert Ghang 32 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.9 / 5
Is well prepared 4.9 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.9 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.9 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.9 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.8 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.7 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.8 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.9 / 5
TA Carlos Flores
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Leonino Colobong
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Akhil Batra
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Amit Akula
This instructor's ratings are hidden.