Computer Science 61B - Summer 2014

Instructor Edwin Liao 114 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.2 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.0 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.2 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.7 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.2 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.0 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.4 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.2 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.1 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 3.9 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.0 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.2 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.8 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.8 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.9 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.7 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.7 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 3.5 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.0 / 5
TA Alan Yao 4 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 3.8 / 5
Is well prepared 3.5 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 3.5 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.5 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.5 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 3.3 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 3.3 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.3 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.0 / 5
TA Kimberly White
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Joseph Moghadam 12 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.0 / 5
Is well prepared 4.5 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.2 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.4 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.1 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 3.8 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 3.4 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 3.0 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 3.8 / 5
TA Patrick Lutz 6 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.3 / 5
Is well prepared 4.3 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.0 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.3 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.3 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.5 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 3.7 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 3.8 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.2 / 5
TA Jimmy Lee 9 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.4 / 5
Is well prepared 4.1 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.1 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.7 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.6 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.1 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.1 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.7 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.4 / 5
TA Sarah Kim 17 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.6 / 5
Is well prepared 4.8 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.8 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.7 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.8 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.7 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.2 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.3 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.6 / 5
TA Christopher Gioia
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Leo Colobong 9 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.3 / 5
Is well prepared 4.6 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.4 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.7 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.8 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.8 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.2 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.7 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.5 / 5
TA Ralph Arroyo
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Munim Ali
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Amit Akula
This instructor's ratings are hidden.