Computer Science 61B - Fall 2003

Instructor Katherine A. Yelick 79 respondents
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.4 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.1 / 5
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.2 / 7
Pace of the course is too fast 3.1 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 3.0 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 3.8 / 5
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.9 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.3 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.1 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.1 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.5 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.1 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.4 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.3 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 4.2 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.1 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.4 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.9 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.0 / 5
Instructor Dan Garcia 79 respondents
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.0 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.6 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.9 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.5 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.6 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.5 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.3 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.4 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.1 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.1 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.2 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 4.2 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.1 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 3.1 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.3 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.5 / 5
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.0 / 7
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.9 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.4 / 5
TA Rishi Kant
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA David Parks
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Igor Gammer
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Ram Gudavalli
This instructor's ratings are hidden.