Computer Science 61B - Spring 2002

Instructor Jonathan Shewchuk 112 respondents
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.6 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.5 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.8 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.2 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.6 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.3 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 4.2 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.6 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.5 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.6 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.0 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.4 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.7 / 5
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.9 / 5
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.2 / 7
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.3 / 7
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.9 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 2.8 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 3.4 / 5
TA Neha Kumar
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Steven Sinha
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Yosen Lin
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Adam Kirk
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Anthony Giardullo
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Ravi Kolluri
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Barath Raghavan 12 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.9 / 5
Is well prepared 4.7 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.8 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 5.0 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.8 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.7 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.6 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.6 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.8 / 5
TA Steve Wong
This instructor's ratings are hidden.