|
Instructor Brian Hou
|
130 respondents |
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
6.0 / 7 |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
5.9 / 7 |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
4.6 / 5 |
| Is enthusiastic about the subject matter |
4.7 / 5 |
| Identifies what he/she considers important |
4.5 / 5 |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
4.4 / 5 |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
4.5 / 5 |
| Encourages questions from students |
4.5 / 5 |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
4.6 / 5 |
| Relates to students as individuals |
4.5 / 5 |
| Is accessible to students outside of class |
4.5 / 5 |
| Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours |
4.6 / 5 |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
4.4 / 5 |
| Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding |
4.3 / 5 |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
4.5 / 5 |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
4.4 / 5 |
| Pace of the course is too fast |
3.9 / 5 |
| The required text/notes are beneficial |
4.1 / 5 |
| Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit |
3.6 / 5 |
|
Instructor Marvin Zhang
|
130 respondents |
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
6.2 / 7 |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
5.9 / 7 |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
4.7 / 5 |
| Is enthusiastic about the subject matter |
4.7 / 5 |
| Identifies what he/she considers important |
4.6 / 5 |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
4.6 / 5 |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
4.6 / 5 |
| Encourages questions from students |
4.6 / 5 |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
4.6 / 5 |
| Relates to students as individuals |
4.5 / 5 |
| Is accessible to students outside of class |
4.5 / 5 |
| Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours |
4.6 / 5 |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
4.5 / 5 |
| Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding |
4.5 / 5 |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
4.6 / 5 |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
4.4 / 5 |
| Pace of the course is too fast |
3.9 / 5 |
| The required text/notes are beneficial |
4.1 / 5 |
| Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit |
3.6 / 5 |
|
TA Daniel Haas
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA John Alvah Thakar
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Samantha Catherine Wong
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Vivian Fang
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Marsalis Gibson
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Eric Yin Bo
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Neil Shailesh Agarwal
|
7 respondents |
| Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness |
6.6 / 5 |
| Helpful in understanding course material |
4.6 / 5 |
| Is well prepared |
4.7 / 5 |
| Communicates ideas effectively |
4.6 / 5 |
| Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter |
4.6 / 5 |
| Answers questions accurately |
4.6 / 5 |
| Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion |
4.9 / 5 |
| Is aware when students are having difficulty |
4.7 / 5 |
| Is accessible during office hours |
4.4 / 5 |
|
TA Zhen Qin
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Ekaterina Stukalova
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Jong Min Baek
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Mitas Ray
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Tammy Nguyen
|
16 respondents |
| Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness |
6.0 / 5 |
| Helpful in understanding course material |
4.5 / 5 |
| Is well prepared |
4.5 / 5 |
| Communicates ideas effectively |
4.4 / 5 |
| Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter |
4.6 / 5 |
| Answers questions accurately |
4.4 / 5 |
| Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion |
4.4 / 5 |
| Is aware when students are having difficulty |
3.9 / 5 |
| Is accessible during office hours |
4.2 / 5 |
