Computer Science 61A - Summer 2016

Instructor Marvin Zhang 130 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.2 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.9 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.7 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.7 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.6 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.6 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.6 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.6 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.6 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 4.5 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.5 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.6 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.5 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.5 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.6 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.4 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.9 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 4.1 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.6 / 5
Instructor Brian Hou 130 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.0 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.9 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.6 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.7 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.5 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.4 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.5 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.5 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.6 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 4.5 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.5 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.6 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.4 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.3 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.5 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.4 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.9 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 4.1 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.6 / 5
TA Tammy Nguyen 16 respondents
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 6.0 / 5
Helpful in understanding course material 4.5 / 5
Is well prepared 4.5 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.4 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.6 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.4 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.4 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 3.9 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.2 / 5
TA Mitas Ray
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Jong Min Baek
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Ekaterina Stukalova
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Zhen Qin
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Neil Shailesh Agarwal 7 respondents
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 6.6 / 5
Helpful in understanding course material 4.6 / 5
Is well prepared 4.7 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.6 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.6 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.6 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.9 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.7 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.4 / 5
TA Eric Yin Bo
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Marsalis Gibson
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Vivian Fang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Samantha Catherine Wong
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA John Alvah Thakar
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Daniel Haas
This instructor's ratings are hidden.