Computer Science 61A - Spring 2014

Instructor Paul Hilfinger 404 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 4.8 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.1 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.9 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.0 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.8 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.0 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.4 / 5
Encourages questions from students 3.8 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.9 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 3.1 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.7 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 3.8 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.1 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.9 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.0 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.9 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.4 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 3.7 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.1 / 5
TA Marvin Zhang 50 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.8 / 5
Is well prepared 4.9 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.8 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.9 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.8 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.8 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.6 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.8 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.8 / 5
TA Chenyang Yuan 23 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.4 / 5
Is well prepared 4.5 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.0 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.7 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.5 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.3 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.1 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.2 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.4 / 5
TA Albert Wu 55 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.9 / 5
Is well prepared 4.8 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.9 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.9 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.9 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.8 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.6 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.7 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.9 / 5
TA Steven Tang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Julia Oh
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Allen Nguyen 13 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.6 / 5
Is well prepared 4.5 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.5 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.9 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.7 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.4 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.2 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.5 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.6 / 5
TA Mark Miyashita 40 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.9 / 5
Is well prepared 4.9 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.9 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 5.0 / 5
Answers questions accurately 5.0 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.9 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.7 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.7 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 5.0 / 5
TA Kaylee Mann
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Joy Jeng
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Michelle Hwang 29 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.5 / 5
Is well prepared 4.3 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.3 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.6 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.5 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.6 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.3 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.5 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.3 / 5
TA Robert Huang 31 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.6 / 5
Is well prepared 4.4 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.5 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.7 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.6 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.6 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.4 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.7 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.7 / 5
TA Shidi Huang 30 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.8 / 5
Is well prepared 4.8 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.8 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 5.0 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.9 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.9 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.9 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.8 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.9 / 5
TA Rohan Chitnis 36 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.6 / 5
Is well prepared 4.6 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.5 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.7 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.7 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.3 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.4 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.4 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.6 / 5
TA Soumya Basu 18 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.3 / 5
Is well prepared 4.3 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.2 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.6 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.5 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.5 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.3 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.2 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.4 / 5