Computer Science 61A - Spring 2001

Instructor Brian K. Harvey 148 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.9 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.9 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.4 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.0 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.4 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.6 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.1 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.3 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.5 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 3.8 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.0 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.1 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.7 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.7 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.0 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.1 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.3 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 4.0 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.8 / 5
Instructor Dan Garcia 146 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 4.9 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.6 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.9 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.7 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.9 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.2 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.1 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.1 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.5 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 4.0 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.2 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.3 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.5 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.3 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.8 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.9 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.4 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 3.9 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.8 / 5
TA Todd Segal
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Glenn Chiu
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Derrill Dabkoski
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Benson Limketkai 20 respondents
Is accessible during office hours 4.7 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.7 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 3.7 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.5 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.9 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.9 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.6 / 5
Is well prepared 4.7 / 5
Helpful in understanding course material 4.5 / 5
TA Robert Nelson
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Jefferson Ng
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Minh Nguyen 11 respondents
Is accessible during office hours 4.3 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.5 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.3 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.3 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.4 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.5 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.5 / 5
Is well prepared 4.5 / 5
Helpful in understanding course material 4.5 / 5
TA Michael Toomim
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Larry Tung
This instructor's ratings are hidden.