Computer Science 294-1 - Spring 1997

Instructor Brian Barsky 21 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 4.2 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 4.0 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.7 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.1 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.5 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.6 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.8 / 5
Encourages questions from students 3.8 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.9 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 3.8 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.6 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 3.7 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.0 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.7 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 2.6 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.5 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 2.0 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 2.0 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.5 / 5
Instructor John Wawrzynek 10 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.0 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.2 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.4 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.6 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.0 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.2 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.6 / 5
Encourages questions from students 3.2 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.8 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 3.6 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.0 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.0 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.8 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.0 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.0 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.4 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.6 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 4.0 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.2 / 5
Instructor Lotfi A. Zadeh 20 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 4.8 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 4.9 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.7 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.2 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.0 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.3 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.4 / 5
Encourages questions from students 3.5 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.8 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 3.8 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.4 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.5 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.6 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.5 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.0 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.8 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 2.4 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 4.1 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.7 / 5
Instructor Y. Bartal 6 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 2.6 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 4.0 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 1.4 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 2.8 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 2.6 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 1.6 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 2.2 / 5
Encourages questions from students 3.4 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.0 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 3.6 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.7 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 3.5 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.8 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 5.0 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 2.2 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.6 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.2 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 5.0 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.8 / 5
Instructor M. Shokrollahi 6 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.8 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.8 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 5.0 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 5.0 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 5.0 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.4 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.8 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.8 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.8 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 4.8 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 5.0 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 5.0 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments N/A
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding N/A
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 5.0 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.8 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 2.2 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 4.5 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 1.5 / 5
TA Dan Garcia 17 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.2 / 5
Is well prepared 4.1 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.2 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 3.9 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.1 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.1 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 3.8 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.2 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.1 / 5
TA T. Blackman
This instructor's ratings are hidden.