|
Instructor Anthony Joseph
|
41 respondents |
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
6.0 / 7 |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
5.8 / 7 |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
4.7 / 5 |
| Is enthusiastic about the subject matter |
4.4 / 5 |
| Identifies what he/she considers important |
4.2 / 5 |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
3.9 / 5 |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
4.3 / 5 |
| Encourages questions from students |
4.3 / 5 |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
4.4 / 5 |
| Relates to students as individuals |
4.0 / 5 |
| Is accessible to students outside of class |
4.2 / 5 |
| Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours |
3.9 / 5 |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
3.9 / 5 |
| Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding |
3.4 / 5 |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
3.4 / 5 |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
4.1 / 5 |
| Pace of the course is too fast |
2.8 / 5 |
| The required text/notes are beneficial |
2.8 / 5 |
| Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit |
2.7 / 5 |
|
Instructor Doug Tygar
|
41 respondents |
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
4.9 / 7 |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
5.4 / 7 |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
3.9 / 5 |
| Is enthusiastic about the subject matter |
4.5 / 5 |
| Identifies what he/she considers important |
3.8 / 5 |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
3.6 / 5 |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
3.8 / 5 |
| Encourages questions from students |
4.2 / 5 |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
3.9 / 5 |
| Relates to students as individuals |
3.7 / 5 |
| Is accessible to students outside of class |
3.2 / 5 |
| Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours |
3.3 / 5 |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
3.8 / 5 |
| Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding |
3.2 / 5 |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
3.4 / 5 |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
3.8 / 5 |
| Pace of the course is too fast |
2.9 / 5 |
| The required text/notes are beneficial |
2.8 / 5 |
| Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit |
2.8 / 5 |
|
Instructor Umesh Vazirani
|
40 respondents |
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
5.4 / 7 |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
5.9 / 7 |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
3.8 / 5 |
| Is enthusiastic about the subject matter |
4.3 / 5 |
| Identifies what he/she considers important |
4.0 / 5 |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
3.6 / 5 |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
3.6 / 5 |
| Encourages questions from students |
4.1 / 5 |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
4.3 / 5 |
| Relates to students as individuals |
3.7 / 5 |
| Is accessible to students outside of class |
4.0 / 5 |
| Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours |
4.3 / 5 |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
3.8 / 5 |
| Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding |
3.5 / 5 |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
3.5 / 5 |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
4.2 / 5 |
| Pace of the course is too fast |
2.8 / 5 |
| The required text/notes are beneficial |
2.7 / 5 |
| Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit |
2.8 / 5 |
|
Instructor David Wagner
|
47 respondents |
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
6.4 / 7 |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
5.9 / 7 |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
4.7 / 5 |
| Is enthusiastic about the subject matter |
4.9 / 5 |
| Identifies what he/she considers important |
4.5 / 5 |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
4.3 / 5 |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
4.3 / 5 |
| Encourages questions from students |
4.7 / 5 |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
4.7 / 5 |
| Relates to students as individuals |
4.3 / 5 |
| Is accessible to students outside of class |
4.5 / 5 |
| Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours |
4.6 / 5 |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
4.0 / 5 |
| Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding |
3.5 / 5 |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
3.6 / 5 |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
4.2 / 5 |
| Pace of the course is too fast |
2.8 / 5 |
| The required text/notes are beneficial |
2.6 / 5 |
| Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit |
2.8 / 5 |
|
TA Paul Huang
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Jeff Kalvass
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Russell Sears
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Ivan Tam
|
13 respondents |
| Helpful in understanding course material |
4.4 / 5 |
| Is well prepared |
4.4 / 5 |
| Communicates ideas effectively |
4.3 / 5 |
| Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter |
4.0 / 5 |
| Answers questions accurately |
3.8 / 5 |
| Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion |
4.6 / 5 |
| Is aware when students are having difficulty |
4.1 / 5 |
| Is accessible during office hours |
4.6 / 5 |
| Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness |
4.4 / 5 |
