Computer Science 189 - Spring 2015

Instructor Peter Bartlett 61 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 4.4 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.9 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.0 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 3.6 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.5 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 2.9 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.4 / 5
Encourages questions from students 3.9 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.1 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 3.5 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.9 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 3.8 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.1 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.8 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.1 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.0 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.3 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 3.5 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.8 / 5
Instructor Alexei Efros 65 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.3 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.4 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.6 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.9 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.5 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.5 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.4 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.6 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.5 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 4.4 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.5 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.5 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.4 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.0 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.2 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.3 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.0 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 3.6 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.7 / 5
TA Pat Virtue 6 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 5.0 / 5
Is well prepared 5.0 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.8 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 5.0 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.8 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 5.0 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.8 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 5.0 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.8 / 5
TA Daniel Xu 11 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.7 / 5
Is well prepared 5.0 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.8 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 5.0 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.8 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.8 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.7 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 5.0 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.9 / 5
TA Christopher Xie
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Kevin Tee
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Faraz Tavakoli
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Yun Park
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Peter Gao
This instructor's ratings are hidden.