Computer Science 170 - Spring 2017

Instructor Sanjam Garg 169 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.2 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.0 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.7 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.0 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.8 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.5 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.6 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.1 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.9 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 3.8 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.9 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 3.9 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.0 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.8 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.9 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.2 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.2 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 4.5 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.0 / 5
Instructor Prasad Raghavendra 169 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.7 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.0 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.1 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.3 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.1 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.0 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.2 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.2 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.2 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 3.8 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.1 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.1 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.1 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.9 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.9 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.2 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.2 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 4.5 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.0 / 5
TA Nicholas Carlini
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Mostafa Rohaninejad
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA SIQI LIU
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Zhen Qin
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Nicholas Patrick Ward
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Allen Tang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Leah Dickstein
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Tony Duan 160 respondents
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.3 / 5
Helpful in understanding course material 4.6 / 5
Is well prepared 4.5 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.5 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.6 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.5 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.6 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.4 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.6 / 5
TA RUDOLPH LAPRADE
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Alex Khodaverdian
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Wesley Hsieh
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Chris Jeng 160 respondents
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.4 / 5
Helpful in understanding course material 4.6 / 5
Is well prepared 4.5 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.5 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.6 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.4 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.6 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.4 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.7 / 5
TA Raymond Chan
This instructor's ratings are hidden.