Computer Science 170 - Fall 2015

Instructor Sanjam Garg 71 respondents
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.2 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.2 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.1 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.5 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.5 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.1 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.1 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 3.6 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.8 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 3.8 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.2 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.2 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.0 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.0 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.2 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 4.4 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.3 / 5
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.2 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.2 / 7
Instructor Prasad Raghavendra 75 respondents
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.4 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.5 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.2 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.0 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.2 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.3 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.3 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 4.0 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.2 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.5 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.3 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.2 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.0 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.1 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.3 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 4.5 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.3 / 5
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.8 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.2 / 7
TA Chen-Hsisteven Bi
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Matthewkm Chow
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Barak Gila 6 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.8 / 5
Is well prepared 4.7 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.5 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 5.0 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.5 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.8 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.5 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.5 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.7 / 5
TA Rudy Laprade
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Manish Raghavan
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Aaronv. Schild
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Vrettos Moulos 11 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.7 / 5
Is well prepared 4.9 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.5 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 5.0 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.8 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.3 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.4 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.7 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.7 / 5
TA Benjamin Weitz
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Jimmy Wu 6 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 5.0 / 5
Is well prepared 5.0 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 5.0 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 5.0 / 5
Answers questions accurately 5.0 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.8 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.7 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 5.0 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 5.0 / 5
TA Alan Yao 3 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.0 / 5
Is well prepared 4.0 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.0 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.0 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.7 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.0 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 3.0 / 5
Is accessible during office hours N/A
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.0 / 5