|
Instructor Scott Shenker
|
180 respondents |
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
6.6 / 7 |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
5.7 / 7 |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
4.7 / 5 |
| Is enthusiastic about the subject matter |
4.9 / 5 |
| Identifies what he/she considers important |
4.9 / 5 |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
4.6 / 5 |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
4.4 / 5 |
| Encourages questions from students |
4.9 / 5 |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
4.9 / 5 |
| Relates to students as individuals |
4.8 / 5 |
| Is accessible to students outside of class |
4.9 / 5 |
| Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours |
4.9 / 5 |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
4.3 / 5 |
| Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding |
4.4 / 5 |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
4.5 / 5 |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
4.6 / 5 |
| Pace of the course is too fast |
2.9 / 5 |
| The required text/notes are beneficial |
3.9 / 5 |
| Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit |
2.6 / 5 |
|
Instructor Sylvia Ratnasamy
|
180 respondents |
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
5.9 / 7 |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
5.7 / 7 |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
4.2 / 5 |
| Is enthusiastic about the subject matter |
4.2 / 5 |
| Identifies what he/she considers important |
4.3 / 5 |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
4.3 / 5 |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
4.3 / 5 |
| Encourages questions from students |
4.2 / 5 |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
4.2 / 5 |
| Relates to students as individuals |
4.2 / 5 |
| Is accessible to students outside of class |
4.2 / 5 |
| Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours |
4.1 / 5 |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
4.2 / 5 |
| Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding |
4.3 / 5 |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
4.5 / 5 |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
4.6 / 5 |
| Pace of the course is too fast |
2.9 / 5 |
| The required text/notes are beneficial |
3.9 / 5 |
| Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit |
2.6 / 5 |
|
TA Luke Brody
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Kevin Chiang
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Gustavo De Leon
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Alex Krentsel
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Vivien Nguyen
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Eli Lipsitz
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Ehimare Okoyomon
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Julie Han
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Christopher Branner-Augmon
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Ian Rodney
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Emmanuel Amaro
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Ray Pan
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Rachel Li
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Will Wang
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Wen Zhang
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
