Computer Science 150 - Spring 1991

Instructor Ronald Fearing 81 respondents
Discusses points of view other than his/her own 3.5 / 5
Discusses recent developments in the field 3.8 / 5
Gives references for more interesting & invovled points 3.5 / 5
Emphasizes conceptual understanding 3.8 / 5
Lectures clearly 3.9 / 5
Is well prepared 4.2 / 5
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.0 / 5
Summarizes major points 3.9 / 5
States objectives for each class session 4.3 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.8 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.8 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.1 / 5
Demonstrates familiarity with subject matter 4.3 / 5
Encourages questions from students 3.9 / 5
Knows if the class is understanding him/her or not 3.2 / 5
Has students apply concepts to demonstrate understanding 3.7 / 5
Has genuine interest in students 3.7 / 5
Gives personal help to students having problems in course 3.8 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 3.6 / 5
Is accessible to students out of class 4.0 / 5
Is valued for advice not directly related to the course 3.0 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.2 / 5
Is enthusiastic about his/her subject 4.0 / 5
Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice 3.6 / 5
Has concern for the quality of his/her teaching 3.8 / 5
Motivates students to do their best work 3.6 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.6 / 5
Stimulates your interest in the subject 3.5 / 5
Gives exams permitting students to show understanding 2.9 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.2 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.9 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.6 / 5
Course is concerned with theory more than its application 2.2 / 5
The required text is beneficial 3.1 / 5
Work load is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.7 / 5
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.0 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.5 / 7
TA Kristofer Pister 3 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 3.3 / 5
Is well prepared 3.0 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 3.7 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 3.0 / 5
Answers questions accurately 3.3 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 3.3 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 3.7 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 3.7 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 3.3 / 5
TA W. Lee
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA S. Burgett
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA P. Houng
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA B. Link
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA R. Rosenholtz
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA T. Zimmerli
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA E. Nicholson
This instructor's ratings are hidden.