Electrical Engineering 43 - Spring 1999

Instructor Roger T. Howe 73 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.7 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.8 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.3 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 3.9 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.2 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.8 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.1 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.2 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.3 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 3.9 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.8 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.1 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.1 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.1 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.0 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.6 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.1 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 3.1 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.1 / 5
Instructor Joseph Wujek 36 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.6 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.7 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.4 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.1 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.3 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.0 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.2 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.2 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.3 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 3.8 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.0 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.1 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.0 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.9 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.9 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.4 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.1 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 3.0 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.1 / 5
Instructor Y. Zhang 4 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.8 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.8 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.3 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 3.5 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.0 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.5 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.0 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.5 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.5 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 4.0 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.7 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.0 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments N/A
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding N/A
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable N/A
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture N/A
Pace of the course is too fast N/A
The required text/notes are beneficial N/A
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit N/A
TA C. Ansjory 0 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material N/A
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.0 / 7
Is well prepared N/A
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.5 / 7
Communicates ideas effectively N/A
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.7 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter N/A
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.7 / 5
Answers questions accurately N/A
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.0 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion N/A
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.0 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty N/A
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.0 / 5
Is accessible during office hours N/A
Encourages questions from students 4.0 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness N/A
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.3 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 4.0 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.0 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 3.0 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.3 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.2 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.2 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.8 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 2.8 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 2.7 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.3 / 5
TA Yi Zhang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA C. Anjsory
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA J. Yee
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA N. Zhou
This instructor's ratings are hidden.