Electrical Engineering 16A - Spring 2015

Instructor Elad Alon 38 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.5 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.4 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.6 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.8 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.6 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.5 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.5 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.7 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.7 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 4.6 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.7 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.8 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.5 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.3 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.9 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.3 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.4 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 3.6 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.7 / 5
Instructor Babak Ayazifar 36 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.7 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.5 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.7 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.9 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.9 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.9 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.8 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.9 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.7 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 4.7 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.6 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.7 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.6 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.5 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.0 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.3 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.6 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 3.7 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.7 / 5
Instructor Gireeja Ranade 36 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.0 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.4 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.3 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.4 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.3 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.1 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.3 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.5 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.7 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 4.3 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.7 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.6 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.4 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.2 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.8 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.2 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.8 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 3.8 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.0 / 5
Instructor Vivek Subramanian 37 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.3 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.3 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.5 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.9 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.5 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.6 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.5 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.6 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.6 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 4.5 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.7 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.8 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.6 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.4 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.0 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.4 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.6 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 3.7 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.7 / 5
Instructor Claire Tomlin 32 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.7 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.2 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.5 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 3.9 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.3 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.8 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.1 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.3 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.4 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 4.0 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.4 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.5 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.5 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.3 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.0 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.3 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.5 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 3.8 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.7 / 5
TA Vikram Iyer
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Nathaniel Mailoa
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Vasuki Swamy
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Paroma Varma
This instructor's ratings are hidden.