Computer Science W186 - Spring 2020

Instructor Josh Hug 349 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.6 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.3 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.9 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.0 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.0 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.9 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.9 / 5
Encourages questions from students 3.9 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.9 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 3.9 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.9 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 3.9 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.9 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.9 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.1 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.1 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.1 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 4.3 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.5 / 5
Instructor Michael Ball 349 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.6 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.3 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.9 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 3.9 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.9 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.8 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.9 / 5
Encourages questions from students 3.9 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.0 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 3.9 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.9 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 3.9 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.9 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.9 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.1 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.1 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.1 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 4.3 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.5 / 5
TA Jennifer Tsui
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Angela Xiao
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Jamie Gu
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Jeremy Dong
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Srisai Mandava
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Brian DeLeonardis
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Jasmine Le
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA John Yang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Jiayue Li
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Chris Wong
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Saurav Chhatrapati
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Jerry Song 338 respondents
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.5 / 5
Helpful in understanding course material 4.8 / 5
Is well prepared 4.8 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.6 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.7 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.6 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.8 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.7 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.8 / 5
TA Noah Kuo
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Ethan Shang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA David Wang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA David Kim
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Ailyn Tong
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Amy Hung
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Justin Cheng
This instructor's ratings are hidden.