Computer Science 70 - Spring 2021

Instructor Shyam Parekh 309 respondents
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.0 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.3 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 3.9 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.6 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.2 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.6 / 5
Encourages questions from students 3.6 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.6 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 3.5 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.8 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 3.9 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.6 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.4 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.4 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.4 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 4.3 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 4.1 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.4 / 5
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 4.6 / 7
Instructor Satish Rao 309 respondents
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.0 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.8 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.3 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.0 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.8 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.6 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.0 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.9 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 4.1 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.0 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.0 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.7 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.4 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.4 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.4 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 4.3 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 4.1 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.4 / 5
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.2 / 7
TA Megan Kawakami
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Rahul Devarapalli
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Lili Chen
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA William Arnold
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Andrew Shi
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Jonathan Wang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Qinhong Chen
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Sylvia Jin
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Dustin Luong
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Michael Wang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Frank Wang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Briana Zhang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Abinav Routhu
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Aishani Sil
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Gilbert Feng
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA William Lin
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Austin Lei
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Tarang Srivastava 305 respondents
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.7 / 5
Helpful in understanding course material 4.8 / 5
Is well prepared 4.9 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.9 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.9 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.9 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.8 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.9 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.8 / 5
TA Richard Hu
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Alberto Checcone
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Abhinav Gopal
This instructor's ratings are hidden.