Computer Science 61C - Spring 2014

Instructor Dan Garcia 223 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.3 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.1 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.7 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 5.0 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.8 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.7 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.6 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.8 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.7 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 4.7 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.4 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.8 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.3 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.2 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.3 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.2 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.6 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 3.8 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.7 / 5
TA Shreyas Chand 23 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.9 / 5
Is well prepared 4.9 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.9 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.9 / 5
Answers questions accurately 5.0 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 5.0 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.8 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.7 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 5.0 / 5
TA Roger Chen 17 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.5 / 5
Is well prepared 4.5 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.2 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.8 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.4 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.2 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 3.9 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.6 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.4 / 5
TA Alan Christopher 17 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.3 / 5
Is well prepared 4.4 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.3 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.4 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.4 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.2 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 3.7 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.3 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.3 / 5
TA Chuquizo Dong
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Sagar Karandikar 42 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.8 / 5
Is well prepared 4.9 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.8 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 5.0 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.9 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.5 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.4 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.9 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.9 / 5
TA William Ku
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Kevin Liston
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Kevin Yeun
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Sungroa Yoon 38 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.7 / 5
Is well prepared 4.7 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.6 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.8 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.8 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.5 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.3 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.9 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.7 / 5