Computer Science 289A - Spring 2016

Instructor Jonathan Shewchuk
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA P. Camacho
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Rohan Chitnis 21 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 5.0 / 5
Is well prepared 4.9 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 5.0 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 5.0 / 5
Answers questions accurately 5.0 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 5.0 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.8 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.9 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.9 / 5
TA Tuomas Haarnoja
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Brian Hou 19 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.6 / 5
Is well prepared 4.3 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.5 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.8 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.6 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.3 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.1 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.8 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.4 / 5
TA Vashisht Madhavan
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Shaun Singh 7 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 4.4 / 5
Is well prepared 4.6 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.4 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.9 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.7 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.9 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 3.9 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 5.0 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.6 / 5
TA Marvin Zhang 10 respondents
Helpful in understanding course material 5.0 / 5
Is well prepared 4.8 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 5.0 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 5.0 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.9 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 5.0 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.9 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 5.0 / 5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 5.0 / 5