|
Instructor Dan Klein
|
266 respondents |
| Is enthusiastic about the subject matter |
4.8 / 5 |
| Identifies what he/she considers important |
4.7 / 5 |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
4.6 / 5 |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
4.7 / 5 |
| Encourages questions from students |
4.6 / 5 |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
4.6 / 5 |
| Relates to students as individuals |
4.5 / 5 |
| Is accessible to students outside of class |
4.5 / 5 |
| Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours |
4.5 / 5 |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
4.5 / 5 |
| Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding |
4.4 / 5 |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
4.5 / 5 |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
4.5 / 5 |
| Pace of the course is too fast |
3.0 / 5 |
| The required text/notes are beneficial |
4.3 / 5 |
| Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit |
3.1 / 5 |
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
6.5 / 7 |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
6.0 / 7 |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
4.7 / 5 |
|
Instructor Pieter Abbeel
|
266 respondents |
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
6.4 / 7 |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
6.0 / 7 |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
4.7 / 5 |
| Is enthusiastic about the subject matter |
4.7 / 5 |
| Identifies what he/she considers important |
4.7 / 5 |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
4.6 / 5 |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
4.6 / 5 |
| Encourages questions from students |
4.6 / 5 |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
4.6 / 5 |
| Relates to students as individuals |
4.5 / 5 |
| Is accessible to students outside of class |
4.5 / 5 |
| Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours |
4.6 / 5 |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
4.5 / 5 |
| Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding |
4.4 / 5 |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
4.5 / 5 |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
4.5 / 5 |
| Pace of the course is too fast |
3.0 / 5 |
| The required text/notes are beneficial |
4.3 / 5 |
| Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit |
3.1 / 5 |
|
TA Yi Wu
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Nikhil Sharma
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Ronghang Hu
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Katie Luo
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Jasmine Deng
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Noah Golmant
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Aditya Baradwaj
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Mitchell Stern
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Ignasi Clavera Gilaberte
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Alexander Li
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA David Gaddy
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Thanard Kurutach
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Daniel Ho
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Wilson Yan
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Laura Smith
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Jonathan Ho
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Nikita Kitaev
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
