Computer Science 162 - Spring 2018

Instructor Jonathan Ragan Kelley 118 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.6 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.9 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.3 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.3 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.2 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.7 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.9 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.3 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.4 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 4.1 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.1 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.2 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.1 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.5 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.0 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.0 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.4 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 3.6 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.3 / 5
Instructor Anthony Joseph 118 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.9 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.9 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.4 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.5 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.3 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.0 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.1 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.4 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.4 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 4.1 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.2 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.2 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.2 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.6 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.0 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.0 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.4 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 3.6 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.3 / 5
TA Kalyanaraman Shankari
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Nitin Manivasagan
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Patrick Yang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Justin Yum
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA William Sheu
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Jack Yang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Eric Hou
This instructor's ratings are hidden.