Computer Science 161 - Spring 2020

Instructor Raluca Popa 506 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.4 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.1 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.7 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.7 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.6 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.4 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.5 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.7 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.7 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 4.5 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.6 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.6 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.5 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.3 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.4 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.4 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 2.9 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 4.1 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.1 / 5
Instructor David Wagner 506 respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.6 / 7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.1 / 7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.7 / 5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.8 / 5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.7 / 5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.6 / 5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.6 / 5
Encourages questions from students 4.8 / 5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.8 / 5
Relates to students as individuals 4.7 / 5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.7 / 5
Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours 4.7 / 5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.6 / 5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.4 / 5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.5 / 5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.4 / 5
Pace of the course is too fast 2.9 / 5
The required text/notes are beneficial 4.1 / 5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.1 / 5
TA Nicholas Ward
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Vivian Fang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Sachit Shroff
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Victor Chan
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Catherine Han
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Seung Jin Yang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Xiangjun Li
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Allen Tong
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Eric Feng
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Andrew Law
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Ryan Lehmkuhl
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Keahooi Hung
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Catherine Lu
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Evan Corriere
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
TA Peyrin Kao 486 respondents
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.8 / 5
Helpful in understanding course material 4.8 / 5
Is well prepared 4.8 / 5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.8 / 5
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.9 / 5
Answers questions accurately 4.8 / 5
Encourages questions and/or classroom discussion 4.8 / 5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.7 / 5
Is accessible during office hours 4.8 / 5
TA Toby Chen
This instructor's ratings are hidden.