|
Instructor Raluca Popa
|
84 respondents |
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
5.9 / 7 |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
5.4 / 7 |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
4.5 / 5 |
| Is enthusiastic about the subject matter |
4.5 / 5 |
| Identifies what he/she considers important |
4.4 / 5 |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
4.1 / 5 |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
4.4 / 5 |
| Encourages questions from students |
4.5 / 5 |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
4.5 / 5 |
| Relates to students as individuals |
4.2 / 5 |
| Is accessible to students outside of class |
4.2 / 5 |
| Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours |
4.3 / 5 |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
4.3 / 5 |
| Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding |
4.0 / 5 |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
4.0 / 5 |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
3.9 / 5 |
| Pace of the course is too fast |
3.0 / 5 |
| The required text/notes are beneficial |
3.5 / 5 |
| Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit |
3.2 / 5 |
|
Instructor Nicholas Weaver
|
84 respondents |
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
5.3 / 7 |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
5.4 / 7 |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
3.3 / 5 |
| Is enthusiastic about the subject matter |
4.8 / 5 |
| Identifies what he/she considers important |
4.0 / 5 |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
4.2 / 5 |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
3.7 / 5 |
| Encourages questions from students |
4.3 / 5 |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
4.0 / 5 |
| Relates to students as individuals |
4.0 / 5 |
| Is accessible to students outside of class |
4.1 / 5 |
| Is friendly and helpful to students during office hours |
4.2 / 5 |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
4.2 / 5 |
| Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding |
3.9 / 5 |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
3.9 / 5 |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
3.9 / 5 |
| Pace of the course is too fast |
3.0 / 5 |
| The required text/notes are beneficial |
3.5 / 5 |
| Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit |
3.2 / 5 |
|
TA Mitar Milutinovic
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Apoorva Dornadula
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Kevin Chen
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Rohan Mathuria
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Calvin Li
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Warren He
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Rohit Sinha
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
|
TA Rebecca Portnoff
|
| This instructor's ratings are hidden. |
