Electrical Engineering 42 Spring 2004

Electrical Engineering 42 Spring 2004

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructor Sheila Ross (below)
TAs Ashwin Ganesan (below)
Joseph Makin (below)

Professor Ross 41 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.3/ 7 ± 0.2
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 4.8/ 7 ± 0.5
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.7/ 5 ± 0.2
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.7/ 5 ± 0.2
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.1/ 5 ± 0.3
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Encourages questions from students 4.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.6/ 5 ± 0.2
Relates to students as individuals 4.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.9/ 5 ± 0.1
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.9/ 5 ± 0.1
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.9/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.8/ 5 ± 0.2
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Pace of the course is too fast 2.2/ 5 ± 0.3
The required text/notes is beneficial 2.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.1/ 5 ± 0.3
 
Teaching Assistant Ashwin Ganesan 15 Respondents
Helpful in understanding material 4.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Is well prepared 4.1/ 5 ± 0.5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.1/ 5 ± 0.3
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.5/ 5 ± 0.5
Answers questions accurately 4.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Encourages questions and/or class discussion 3.9/ 5 ± 0.6
Is aware when students are having difficulty 3.7/ 5 ± 0.5
Is accessible during office hours 4.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.1/ 5 ± 0.4
 
Teaching Assistant Joseph Makin 19 Respondents
Helpful in understanding material 4.1/ 5 ± 0.4
Is well prepared 4.1/ 5 ± 0.3
Communicates ideas effectively 3.9/ 5 ± 0.3
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.4/ 5 ± 0.2
Answers questions accurately 4.2/ 5 ± 0.3
Encourages questions and/or class discussion 4.6/ 5 ± 0.2
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.0/ 5 ± 0.3
Is accessible during office hours 4.2/ 5 ± 0.3
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.1/ 5 ± 0.3
 

[Statistics for Spring 2004]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.