Electrical Engineering 40 Spring 1991 Section 1

Electrical Engineering 40 Spring 1991 Section 1

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructor Martin H. Graham (below)
TAs S. Chang (below)
D. Wang (below)
A. Wong (below)

Professor Martin H. Graham 17 Respondents
Discusses points of view other than his/her own 3.5/ 5 ± 0.6
Discusses recent developments in the field 3.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Gives references for more interesting & invovled points 3.3/ 5 ± 0.7
Emphasizes conceptual understanding 3.6/ 5 ± 0.6
Lectures clearly 2.7/ 5 ± 0.7
Is well prepared 3.5/ 5 ± 0.7
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.2/ 5 ± 0.7
Summarizes major points 2.8/ 5 ± 0.6
States objectives for each class session 2.4/ 5 ± 0.6
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.1/ 5 ± 0.6
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.2/ 5 ± 0.7
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.3/ 5 ± 0.6
Demonstrates familiarity with subject matter 4.1/ 5 ± 0.5
Encourages questions from students 3.4/ 5 ± 0.6
Knows if the class is understanding him/her or not 2.7/ 5 ± 0.6
Has students apply concepts to demonstrate understanding 2.8/ 5 ± 0.7
Has genuine interest in students 4.0/ 5 ± 0.5
Gives personal help to students having problems in course 3.7/ 5 ± 0.6
Relates to students as individuals 3.7/ 5 ± 0.6
Is accessible to students out of class 3.6/ 5 ± 0.6
Is valued for advice not directly related to the course 2.8/ 5 ± 0.7
Has an interesting style of presentation 2.9/ 5 ± 0.7
Is enthusiastic about his/her subject 3.5/ 5 ± 0.6
Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice 2.6/ 5 ± 0.7
Has concern for the quality of his/her teaching 3.4/ 5 ± 0.7
Motivates students to do their best work 2.6/ 5 ± 0.6
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 2.6/ 5 ± 0.6
Stimulates your interest in the subject 2.6/ 5 ± 0.7
Gives exams permitting students to show understanding 2.8/ 5 ± 0.7
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 2.5/ 5 ± 0.6
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 2.4/ 5 ± 0.7
Pace of the course is too fast 3.9/ 5 ± 0.6
Course is concerned with theory more than its application 3.5/ 5 ± 0.6
The required text is beneficial 3.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Work load is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.2/ 5 ± 0.7
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 3.8/ 7 ± 0.9
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 4.5/ 7 ± 0.8
 
Teaching Assistant S. Chang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 
Teaching Assistant D. Wang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 
Teaching Assistant A. Wong
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 

[Statistics for Spring 1991]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.