Electrical Engineering 40 Fall 1989 Section 3

Electrical Engineering 40 Fall 1989 Section 3

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructor Richar Stewart (below)
TAs S. Chiu (below)
Jang Teng (below)

Professor Stewart 40 Respondents
Discusses points of view other than his/her own 3.8/ 5 ± 0.2
Discusses recent developments in the field 3.4/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives references for more interesting & invovled points 3.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Emphasizes conceptual understanding 4.1/ 5 ± 0.3
Lectures clearly 4.6/ 5 ± 0.2
Is well prepared 4.8/ 5 ± 0.1
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.7/ 5 ± 0.2
Summarizes major points 4.1/ 5 ± 0.3
States objectives for each class session 3.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.2/ 5 ± 0.2
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.1/ 5 ± 0.3
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.3/ 5 ± 0.2
Demonstrates familiarity with subject matter 4.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Encourages questions from students 4.0/ 5 ± 0.3
Knows if the class is understanding him/her or not 3.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Has students apply concepts to demonstrate understanding 3.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Has genuine interest in students 4.0/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives personal help to students having problems in course 4.1/ 5 ± 0.3
Relates to students as individuals 3.9/ 5 ± 0.3
Is accessible to students out of class 4.2/ 5 ± 0.3
Is valued for advice not directly related to the course 3.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Is enthusiastic about his/her subject 3.9/ 5 ± 0.2
Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice 3.8/ 5 ± 0.3
Has concern for the quality of his/her teaching 4.1/ 5 ± 0.3
Motivates students to do their best work 3.4/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.4/ 5 ± 0.3
Stimulates your interest in the subject 3.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives exams permitting students to show understanding 3.9/ 5 ± 0.3
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.2/ 5 ± 0.2
Pace of the course is too fast 2.8/ 5 ± 0.4
Course is concerned with theory more than its application 2.9/ 5 ± 0.4
The required text is beneficial 3.9/ 5 ± 0.3
Work load is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.8/ 7 ± 0.3
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.7/ 7 ± 0.4
 
Teaching Assistant S. Chiu
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 
Teaching Assistant Jang Teng
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 

[Statistics for Fall 1989]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.