Electrical Engineering 290O Spring 1995 Section 1

Electrical Engineering 290O Spring 1995 Section 1

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructors Roger T. Howe (below)
Richard S. Muller (below)
Richard M. White (below)

Professor Howe 3 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.0/ 7 ± 2.5
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.3/ 7 ± 1.5
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.3/ 5 ± 1.5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.7/ 5 ± 1.5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.7/ 5 ± 1.5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.7/ 5 ± 1.5
Encourages questions from students 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.7/ 5 ± 1.5
Relates to students as individuals 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.7/ 5 ± 1.5
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.3/ 5 ± 1.5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Pace of the course is too fast 2.7/ 5 ± 5.2
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.7/ 5 ± 3.0
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 1.3/ 5 ± 1.5
 
Professor Muller 3 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.0/ 7 ± 2.5
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.3/ 7 ± 1.5
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.3/ 5 ± 1.5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.7/ 5 ± 1.5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.7/ 5 ± 1.5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.7/ 5 ± 1.5
Encourages questions from students 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.7/ 5 ± 1.5
Relates to students as individuals 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.7/ 5 ± 1.5
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.3/ 5 ± 1.5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Pace of the course is too fast 2.7/ 5 ± 5.2
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.7/ 5 ± 3.0
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 1.3/ 5 ± 1.5
 
Professor White 3 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.0/ 7 ± 2.5
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.3/ 7 ± 1.5
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.3/ 5 ± 1.5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.7/ 5 ± 1.5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.7/ 5 ± 1.5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.7/ 5 ± 1.5
Encourages questions from students 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.7/ 5 ± 1.5
Relates to students as individuals 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.7/ 5 ± 1.5
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.3/ 5 ± 1.5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Pace of the course is too fast 2.7/ 5 ± 5.2
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.7/ 5 ± 3.0
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 1.3/ 5 ± 1.5
 

[Statistics for Spring 1995]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.