Electrical Engineering 290O Spring 1994

Electrical Engineering 290O Spring 1994

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructors Roger T. Howe (below)
Richard S. Muller (below)
Albert Pisano (below)
Richard M. White (below)

Professor Howe 17 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.9/ 7 ± 0.4
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.3/ 7 ± 0.6
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.4/ 5 ± 0.3
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.4/ 5 ± 0.3
Encourages questions from students 4.0/ 5 ± 0.4
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.2/ 5 ± 0.5
Relates to students as individuals 4.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.9/ 5 ± 0.4
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.0/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.4/ 5 ± 0.5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding Omitted
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.6/ 5 ± 0.5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.2/ 5 ± 0.5
Pace of the course is too fast 2.5/ 5 ± 0.5
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.8/ 5 ± 0.6
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.8/ 5 ± 0.5
 
Professor Muller 16 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.0/ 7 ± 0.8
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.1/ 7 ± 0.7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.1/ 5 ± 0.5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.9/ 5 ± 0.6
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.3/ 5 ± 0.5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.9/ 5 ± 0.5
Encourages questions from students 4.1/ 5 ± 0.5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.1/ 5 ± 0.5
Relates to students as individuals 3.9/ 5 ± 0.6
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.9/ 5 ± 0.6
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 3.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.0/ 5 ± 0.7
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding Omitted
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.9/ 5 ± 0.4
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.8/ 5 ± 0.7
Pace of the course is too fast 2.6/ 5 ± 0.5
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.3/ 5 ± 0.7
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.8/ 5 ± 0.5
 
Professor Pisano 16 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.4/ 7 ± 0.4
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.4/ 7 ± 0.6
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.8/ 5 ± 0.2
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.2/ 5 ± 0.4
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.9/ 5 ± 0.1
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Encourages questions from students 4.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.1/ 5 ± 0.5
Relates to students as individuals 4.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.4/ 5 ± 0.6
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.1/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 2.0/ 5 ± 0.5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 1.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.8/ 5 ± 0.6
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.2/ 5 ± 0.4
Pace of the course is too fast 2.8/ 5 ± 0.6
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.7/ 5 ± 0.7
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.8/ 5 ± 0.5
 
Professor White 16 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 4.9/ 7 ± 0.7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.1/ 7 ± 0.7
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.7/ 5 ± 0.5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 3.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.2/ 5 ± 0.5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.7/ 5 ± 0.5
Encourages questions from students 4.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Relates to students as individuals 3.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.9/ 5 ± 0.4
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 3.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding Omitted
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.8/ 5 ± 0.3
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.0/ 5 ± 0.3
Pace of the course is too fast 2.5/ 5 ± 0.4
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.6/ 5 ± 0.3
 

[Statistics for Spring 1994]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.