Electrical Engineering 290O Spring 1992

Electrical Engineering 290O Spring 1992

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructors Roger T. Howe (below)
Richard S. Muller (below)
Albert Pisano (below)
Richard M. White (below)

Professor Howe 4 Respondents
Discusses points of view other than his/her own 4.3/ 5 ± 1.0
Discusses recent developments in the field 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Gives references for more interesting & invovled points 4.7/ 5 ± 1.0
Emphasizes conceptual understanding 4.0/ 5 ± 1.6
Lectures clearly 4.7/ 5 ± 1.0
Is well prepared 4.7/ 5 ± 1.0
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.7/ 5 ± 1.0
Summarizes major points 4.0/ 5 ± 1.6
States objectives for each class session 4.7/ 5 ± 1.0
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.7/ 5 ± 1.0
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.3/ 5 ± 1.9
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.7/ 5 ± 1.0
Demonstrates familiarity with subject matter 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Encourages questions from students 4.7/ 5 ± 1.0
Knows if the class is understanding him/her or not 4.7/ 5 ± 1.0
Has students apply concepts to demonstrate understanding 3.3/ 5 ± 2.4
Has genuine interest in students 4.7/ 5 ± 1.0
Gives personal help to students having problems in course 4.0/ 5 ± 2.2
Relates to students as individuals 4.0/ 5 ± 1.6
Is accessible to students out of class 4.7/ 5 ± 1.0
Is valued for advice not directly related to the course 4.7/ 5 ± 1.0
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.7/ 5 ± 1.0
Is enthusiastic about his/her subject 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice 4.7/ 5 ± 1.0
Has concern for the quality of his/her teaching 4.7/ 5 ± 1.0
Motivates students to do their best work 4.7/ 5 ± 1.0
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.7/ 5 ± 1.9
Stimulates your interest in the subject 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Gives exams permitting students to show understanding 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.0/ 5 ± 1.6
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.3/ 5 ± 1.9
Pace of the course is too fast 1.7/ 5 ± 1.0
Course is concerned with theory more than its application 1.7/ 5 ± 1.9
The required text is beneficial 4.0/ 5 ± 2.7
Work load is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.0/ 7 ± 1.3
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.0/ 7 ± 1.3
 
Professor Muller 4 Respondents
Discusses points of view other than his/her own 4.7/ 5 ± 1.0
Discusses recent developments in the field 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Gives references for more interesting & invovled points 4.7/ 5 ± 1.0
Emphasizes conceptual understanding 3.7/ 5 ± 1.9
Lectures clearly 4.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Is well prepared 4.7/ 5 ± 1.0
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.7/ 5 ± 1.0
Summarizes major points 4.3/ 5 ± 1.9
States objectives for each class session 4.0/ 5 ± 1.6
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.3/ 5 ± 1.0
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.7/ 5 ± 1.0
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.7/ 5 ± 1.0
Demonstrates familiarity with subject matter 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Encourages questions from students 4.7/ 5 ± 1.0
Knows if the class is understanding him/her or not 4.3/ 5 ± 1.0
Has students apply concepts to demonstrate understanding 3.0/ 5 ± 1.6
Has genuine interest in students 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Gives personal help to students having problems in course 4.3/ 5 ± 1.9
Relates to students as individuals 4.3/ 5 ± 1.9
Is accessible to students out of class 4.7/ 5 ± 1.0
Is valued for advice not directly related to the course 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.7/ 5 ± 1.0
Is enthusiastic about his/her subject 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice 4.3/ 5 ± 1.0
Has concern for the quality of his/her teaching 4.7/ 5 ± 1.0
Motivates students to do their best work 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.0/ 5 ± 1.6
Stimulates your interest in the subject 4.7/ 5 ± 1.0
Gives exams permitting students to show understanding 4.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.0/ 5 ± 1.6
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.7/ 5 ± 2.4
Pace of the course is too fast 2.0/ 5 ± 1.6
Course is concerned with theory more than its application 1.7/ 5 ± 1.9
The required text is beneficial 4.0/ 5 ± 2.7
Work load is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.0/ 7 ± 1.3
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.2/ 7 ± 1.6
 
Professor Pisano 3 Respondents
Discusses points of view other than his/her own 4.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Discusses recent developments in the field 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Gives references for more interesting & invovled points 3.5/ 5 ± 1.7
Emphasizes conceptual understanding 3.5/ 5 ± 1.7
Lectures clearly 4.5/ 5 ± 1.7
Is well prepared 4.0/ 5 ± 3.5
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.5/ 5 ± 1.7
Summarizes major points 4.0/ 5 ± 0.0
States objectives for each class session 4.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Is careful and precise in answering questions 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.5/ 5 ± 1.7
Demonstrates familiarity with subject matter 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Encourages questions from students 4.5/ 5 ± 1.7
Knows if the class is understanding him/her or not 4.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Has students apply concepts to demonstrate understanding 2.5/ 5 ± 1.7
Has genuine interest in students 4.5/ 5 ± 1.7
Gives personal help to students having problems in course 4.0/ 5 ± 3.5
Relates to students as individuals 4.0/ 5 ± 3.5
Is accessible to students out of class 4.5/ 5 ± 1.7
Is valued for advice not directly related to the course 4.5/ 5 ± 1.7
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.5/ 5 ± 1.7
Is enthusiastic about his/her subject 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice 3.0/ 5 ± 3.5
Has concern for the quality of his/her teaching 4.5/ 5 ± 1.7
Motivates students to do their best work 4.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.0/ 5 ± 3.5
Stimulates your interest in the subject 4.5/ 5 ± 1.7
Gives exams permitting students to show understanding Omitted
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.5/ 5 ± 1.7
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.5/ 5 ± 1.7
Pace of the course is too fast 1.5/ 5 ± 1.7
Course is concerned with theory more than its application 2.0/ 5 ± 3.5
The required text is beneficial 3.5/ 5 ± 5.2
Work load is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.0/ 7 ± 2.5
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.7/ 7 ± 1.5
 
Professor White 4 Respondents
Discusses points of view other than his/her own 4.8/ 5 ± 0.8
Discusses recent developments in the field 4.8/ 5 ± 0.8
Gives references for more interesting & invovled points 4.8/ 5 ± 0.8
Emphasizes conceptual understanding 3.5/ 5 ± 2.1
Lectures clearly 4.2/ 5 ± 0.8
Is well prepared 4.8/ 5 ± 0.8
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.0/ 5 ± 1.3
Summarizes major points 4.0/ 5 ± 1.3
States objectives for each class session 4.2/ 5 ± 0.8
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.0/ 5 ± 1.3
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.2/ 5 ± 0.8
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.0/ 5 ± 1.9
Demonstrates familiarity with subject matter 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Encourages questions from students 4.2/ 5 ± 1.6
Knows if the class is understanding him/her or not 4.2/ 5 ± 0.8
Has students apply concepts to demonstrate understanding 3.5/ 5 ± 2.1
Has genuine interest in students 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Gives personal help to students having problems in course 4.2/ 5 ± 1.6
Relates to students as individuals 4.5/ 5 ± 1.6
Is accessible to students out of class 4.5/ 5 ± 1.0
Is valued for advice not directly related to the course 4.0/ 5 ± 1.3
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.0/ 5 ± 1.3
Is enthusiastic about his/her subject 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice 4.0/ 5 ± 1.3
Has concern for the quality of his/her teaching 4.5/ 5 ± 1.0
Motivates students to do their best work 4.5/ 5 ± 1.0
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.5/ 5 ± 2.1
Stimulates your interest in the subject 4.8/ 5 ± 0.8
Gives exams permitting students to show understanding Omitted
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.8/ 5 ± 2.1
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.3/ 5 ± 1.9
Pace of the course is too fast 1.7/ 5 ± 1.0
Course is concerned with theory more than its application 1.7/ 5 ± 1.9
The required text is beneficial 4.0/ 5 ± 2.7
Work load is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.0/ 7 ± 1.3
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.0/ 7 ± 1.3
 

[Statistics for Spring 1992]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.