Electrical Engineering 290G Spring 1996

Electrical Engineering 290G Spring 1996

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructors Roger T. Howe (below)
Richard S. Muller (below)
Richard M. White (below)

Professor Howe 14 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.0/ 7 ± 0.4
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.3/ 7 ± 0.6
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.8/ 5 ± 0.2
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.4/ 5 ± 0.3
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Encourages questions from students 4.1/ 5 ± 0.4
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.4/ 5 ± 0.3
Relates to students as individuals 4.3/ 5 ± 0.5
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.9/ 5 ± 0.5
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.4/ 5 ± 0.5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.7/ 5 ± 0.5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding Omitted
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.4/ 5 ± 0.6
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Pace of the course is too fast 2.7/ 5 ± 0.6
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.6/ 5 ± 0.6
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.5/ 5 ± 0.5
 
Professor Muller 12 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.6/ 7 ± 0.6
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.1/ 7 ± 0.6
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.0/ 5 ± 0.4
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.4/ 5 ± 0.4
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.2/ 5 ± 0.4
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.0/ 5 ± 0.4
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.4/ 5 ± 0.4
Encourages questions from students 4.0/ 5 ± 0.4
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.1/ 5 ± 0.3
Relates to students as individuals 4.0/ 5 ± 0.6
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.1/ 5 ± 0.4
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.4/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.7/ 5 ± 0.6
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding Omitted
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.5/ 5 ± 0.6
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.2/ 5 ± 0.4
Pace of the course is too fast 2.5/ 5 ± 0.8
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.7/ 5 ± 0.7
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.4/ 5 ± 0.6
 
Professor White 12 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.8/ 7 ± 0.4
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.9/ 7 ± 0.8
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.0/ 5 ± 0.4
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.2/ 5 ± 0.4
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.2/ 5 ± 0.4
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.0/ 5 ± 0.4
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.2/ 5 ± 0.4
Encourages questions from students 4.2/ 5 ± 0.4
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.1/ 5 ± 0.3
Relates to students as individuals 4.2/ 5 ± 0.4
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.9/ 5 ± 0.6
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.3/ 5 ± 0.7
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.6/ 5 ± 0.6
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding Omitted
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.5/ 5 ± 0.6
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.1/ 5 ± 0.4
Pace of the course is too fast 2.4/ 5 ± 0.9
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.7/ 5 ± 0.7
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.3/ 5 ± 0.5
 

[Statistics for Spring 1996]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.