Electrical Engineering 244 Fall 2008

Electrical Engineering 244 Fall 2008

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructors Kurt Keutzer (below)
Sanjit Seshia (below)

Professor Keutzer 8 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.6/ 7 ± 0.8
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.4/ 7 ± 0.9
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.3/ 5 ± 0.6
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.9/ 5 ± 0.5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.4/ 5 ± 0.6
Encourages questions from students 4.5/ 5 ± 0.6
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.3/ 5 ± 0.6
Relates to students as individuals 4.6/ 5 ± 0.6
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.4/ 5 ± 0.8
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.5/ 5 ± 0.7
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.0/ 5 ± 0.5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.1/ 5 ± 0.7
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.4/ 5 ± 0.6
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.5/ 5 ± 0.6
Pace of the course is too fast 2.6/ 5 ± 0.9
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.1/ 5 ± 0.7
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.3/ 5 ± 0.6
 
Professor Seshia 8 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.0/ 7 ± 0.6
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.4/ 7 ± 0.9
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.3/ 5 ± 0.6
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.6/ 5 ± 0.4
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.8/ 5 ± 0.3
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.9/ 5 ± 0.5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.0/ 5 ± 0.6
Encourages questions from students 4.8/ 5 ± 0.3
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.6/ 5 ± 0.4
Relates to students as individuals 4.9/ 5 ± 0.3
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.4/ 5 ± 0.6
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.5/ 5 ± 0.7
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.1/ 5 ± 0.7
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.8/ 5 ± 0.3
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.6/ 5 ± 0.6
Pace of the course is too fast 2.5/ 5 ± 0.9
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.3/ 5 ± 0.8
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.1/ 5 ± 0.5
 

[Statistics for Fall 2008]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.